<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minimal Accordion and lots of fixes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bit-101.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bit-101.com/blog/?p=2533</link>
	<description>Bill Gates Touched My Mac Book Pro</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:38:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.bit-101.com/blog/?p=2533#comment-12668</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bit-101.com/blog/?p=2533#comment-12668</guid>
		<description>Hello thanks for sharing your code. Its nice to find some as3 only components that aren&#039;t dependent on a massive framework.

I want to animate the transitions between the accordion windows it proves quite difficult when you use removeChild(_panel)  and make the Vbox update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello thanks for sharing your code. Its nice to find some as3 only components that aren&#8217;t dependent on a massive framework.</p>
<p>I want to animate the transitions between the accordion windows it proves quite difficult when you use removeChild(_panel)  and make the Vbox update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Goes</title>
		<link>http://www.bit-101.com/blog/?p=2533#comment-12667</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Goes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bit-101.com/blog/?p=2533#comment-12667</guid>
		<description>Nice new component!
I like the addWindow and getWindowAt methods.
But from a (end)user point of view, (maybe this is to much of a detail) I prefer to have the complete name of a window (maybe even the complete title bar) to be clickable in stead of just the arrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice new component!<br />
I like the addWindow and getWindowAt methods.<br />
But from a (end)user point of view, (maybe this is to much of a detail) I prefer to have the complete name of a window (maybe even the complete title bar) to be clickable in stead of just the arrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
